Organisational barriers and facilitators to the implementation of best practices within paediatric forensic radiographic practice - A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Implementation and application of evidence-based practice through legislation, international and national guidelines and local protocols is integral to the successful undertaking of forensic radiographic practice, because of its medico-legal role. This research aims to evaluate those organisational barriers and facilitators to its effective implementation. METHODS: This scoping review was undertaken according to the JBI updated guidelines using the PCC mnemonic. A systematic search of 10 databases was undertaken to identify literature addressing the research question relating to this aspect of forensic radiography practice. Handsearching and snowballing were also included to enhance this search strategy. The search focussed on forensic imaging of paediatrics, the living and deceased. RESULTS: Of the 301 papers initially selected, 9 articles were identified as eligible for inclusion, encompassing an international perspective. Through Inductive Content Analysis, 5 conceptual categories were developed: ineffective organisational governance, education translation, system brakes, default practice, and value-based judgement. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that there are many complex and multifactorial organisational issues impacting upon effective implementation of best practices within paediatric forensic imaging. There is a need to address these issues, before attempting strategies for future implementation. It is essential to recognise that there can be no one-size-fits approach, but rather tailored strategies are required recognising individual needs within the multi-disciplinary scope of forensic radiographic practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Failure to recognise and address the identified issues impacting upon effective implementation, may have significant implications on the processes and individuals involved in the forensic imaging acquisition pathway. Successful addressing of these issues may enable the professionals involved in organisational governance to create a more conducive and receptive environment for best-practice implementation.

A qualitative exploration of the experiences of post-mortem forensic imaging in Malta: A psychological perspective.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to qualitatively explore the experiences of post-mortem forensic imaging on theatre and trauma radiographers from a psychological perspective at a general hospital in Malta. METHODOLOGY: The study utilised purposive sampling to recruit five radiographers undertaking forensic post-mortem imaging in a general hospital in Malta. Individual face-to-face semi-structured interviews were held. Interpretative phenomenological principles and reflexivity were applied throughout the transcription and analysis phases. RESULTS: Four themes were developed from the interpretive phenomenological analysis of semi-structured interviews: 'The impact of the imaging process,' 'Psychological distancing,' 'Finding meaning in work,' and 'Resource needs,' the latter comprising three subordinate themes: 'Protocols,' 'Physical resources,' and 'Psychological training.' CONCLUSION: Forensic radiography is a rewarding area of practice yet one that can be complex and have a lasting psychological impact. Many factors including working close to the cadaver, a lack of appropriate training and staffing levels and a lack of evidence-based protocols were identified by participants as contributing to potential psychological stress and emotional distress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Exploration and evaluation of the psychological experiences of radiographers undertaking post-mortem imaging will inform the development of appropriate psychological services and reinforce the need for the appropriate application of best practice guidelines and protocols to support radiographers working on traumatic cases within forensic and general radiographic practice.